*TEARS HAIR OUT*
May. 11th, 2007 09:40 amOkay, I owe comments, feedback, I have a garden picspam coming, and I need to get my walk in before I put it off for the day, but I just read a review in the paper for 28 Days Later's sequel in which they refer to the biters/ragers/evil as zombies, and listen to me:
THEY ARE NOT ZOMBIES.
I loved that movie (Cillian peen in the beginning, what? Oh, and the movie was very frightening and awesome looking and you know, RAGE VIRUS) but ZOMBIES are the dead that have come BACK, REANIMATED. The evil in those movies AREN'T DEAD YET. (Maybe they are in the sequel, but they WERE NOT in the original.)
This random rant brought to you by Head Desk, Inc. "Have you pounded your head today?"
THEY ARE NOT ZOMBIES.
I loved that movie (Cillian peen in the beginning, what? Oh, and the movie was very frightening and awesome looking and you know, RAGE VIRUS) but ZOMBIES are the dead that have come BACK, REANIMATED. The evil in those movies AREN'T DEAD YET. (Maybe they are in the sequel, but they WERE NOT in the original.)
This random rant brought to you by Head Desk, Inc. "Have you pounded your head today?"
no subject
Date: 2007-05-11 02:53 pm (UTC)Then I watched it was all WTF? Where's the zombies???
I felt cheated.
Actually, I still feel cheated.
But... there is a horrifyingly bad-looking zombie movie coming out that might make up for it.
What's better than Snakes on Motherf*cking Plane? Zombies on a Plane! Seriously. Trailer for Flight of the Living Dead (http://www.ifitsmovies.com/2007/05/07/omg-zombies-on-a-plane-what-will-they-think-of-next/). It was originally called Plane Dead. hahaha *snort*
Plus Fido (http://www.fangoria.com/news_article.php?id=4217) looks good.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-11 04:22 pm (UTC)I LOVE the title Plane Dead, hahaha! Oooh, I don't know about Fido, so thanks for the head's up! \o/
no subject
Date: 2007-05-11 03:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-11 04:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-11 04:10 pm (UTC)28 Days Later scares the poopy out of me, as do zombies, but 28 Days Later is a disease flick. The creators think of it as a disease flick, and some suit at the production company decided people would, "get" zombies.
I am truely concerned about this sequel... none of the same actors, writers, or directors. That smells like trouble to me.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-11 04:25 pm (UTC)I'm hearing really good things about the sequel, to be honest. Hmmm. I'm waiting to hear from more trusted sources before I plunk down my nine bucks.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-11 05:06 pm (UTC)My anti-sequel flag is flapping in the breeze. I don't know, mayhap I'll wait til it's showing at the discount theatre.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-12 01:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-12 01:45 am (UTC)In an animal testing facility, some chimps (being rescued by some PeTa types) break out and infect people with a "rage" virus. It takes 20 seconds to activate, if a person gets even a single drop of infected blood on them. (In a cut, wound, eye, mucus membrane) and the person wants meat. As in: human flesh. So, they're not zombies, but they're no longer functioning humans, either.
Cillian Murphy wakes up in the hospital after a coma and no one's there. Those shots of Britain are AMAZING. Except... he's not alone, BUM BUM BUM!!
It's TERRIFYING.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-14 05:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-12 06:20 am (UTC)Also yes. chuh. They're not zombies. This ain't Thriller.