Tongue firmly in cheek.
Jun. 12th, 2007 10:29 amI was all prepared to go off on a Denis Miller-esque rant this morning, and then I flubbed while wearing my "Rocket Scientist" t-shirt (asked a grocer how much something cost when there was a massive sign overhead with the price. DERR.) and am laughing at myself too hard to be perturbed any more. But I will post a snarky poll under a cut to get my message across, because I enjoy the snark.
[Poll #1001850]
*cough* I've been getting comments like this for a few years. DUDE. What the hell, people?
In other news, Big Love!! I have crazy love for that show, even though I think it's a misstep that the Henricksons don't wear garments. I mean, they WERE LDS, even though they've clearly gone off into fundamentalism. (Which is more common that you might think.) [ETA] WHAT THE HELL, LJ??? It just screwed up all that I wrote to the point that I have no idea what I was even TRYING to say. BAH. Show = good. I had issues with a few things that most people won't care about. WHATEVER. *grumpy as shit, now*
I just finished a re-telling of Dorothy Allred Solomon's memoir about growing up in a major polygamist family (her father was murdered by a rival "prophet") and I found it interesting how much she redacted in her second book. The original, "In My Father's House," was pulled from the shelves, incidentally. Taken out were her husband's experiment with polygamy after promising her to be monogamous, in addition to a bout of wife-swapping during the sexual revolution after Vietnam. *cough* She and her husband are active LDS members now, and I wonder if that has anything to do with her "remembering things correctly with the passage of time?" Uh huh. Also, the story itself is compelling, but the over-wrought imagery that all of these LDS (and ex-LDS) writers use wears me out. But the story is fascinating.
I have loads of writing I need to do today. This is both a good and bad thing. :) However, I did just fill my freezer with popcicles, so... Life is pretty sweet over all.
[Poll #1001850]
*cough* I've been getting comments like this for a few years. DUDE. What the hell, people?
In other news, Big Love!! I have crazy love for that show, even though I think it's a misstep that the Henricksons don't wear garments. I mean, they WERE LDS, even though they've clearly gone off into fundamentalism. (Which is more common that you might think.) [ETA] WHAT THE HELL, LJ??? It just screwed up all that I wrote to the point that I have no idea what I was even TRYING to say. BAH. Show = good. I had issues with a few things that most people won't care about. WHATEVER. *grumpy as shit, now*
I just finished a re-telling of Dorothy Allred Solomon's memoir about growing up in a major polygamist family (her father was murdered by a rival "prophet") and I found it interesting how much she redacted in her second book. The original, "In My Father's House," was pulled from the shelves, incidentally. Taken out were her husband's experiment with polygamy after promising her to be monogamous, in addition to a bout of wife-swapping during the sexual revolution after Vietnam. *cough* She and her husband are active LDS members now, and I wonder if that has anything to do with her "remembering things correctly with the passage of time?" Uh huh. Also, the story itself is compelling, but the over-wrought imagery that all of these LDS (and ex-LDS) writers use wears me out. But the story is fascinating.
I have loads of writing I need to do today. This is both a good and bad thing. :) However, I did just fill my freezer with popcicles, so... Life is pretty sweet over all.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 03:39 pm (UTC)I have big love for "Big Love." Let's take a moment to admire my oh-so-witty skills.
Also, WHAT ARE YOU TRYING TO SAY?!? Is that some kind of crazy Mormom talk?!? STONEY, I DO NOT UNDERSTAND.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 03:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 03:49 pm (UTC)Just stopped by to say sometimes I liked Connor and sometimes I didn't but hey....not everyone liked Lindsey either so it's all good.
And VK...rawrrrrrr.
*weg*
no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 03:52 pm (UTC)I don't get why people don't know that stuff. (I used to get that every time I made a Connor post! o_0)
*squish*
no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 04:01 pm (UTC)I've had a few nasty Lindsey-related comments left for me like that from time to time. I just don't let them bother me any more or defend my opinions, except to say that they *are* mine.
And I don't comment in someone else's lj when I see people rag on other characters that I like, let's say..Riley..for example.
Hell, everyone's allowed to think what they will. I'd just prefer it if they did so politely.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 04:11 pm (UTC)(Oooh, and I love me some Riley, too. I love just about every character Joss created. Some I'm meh about, but I love 99% of them, you know? Sheesh.)
And I'm a huge proponent of speaking your mind in your journal. Why shit on someone in theirs? I wonder if people just don't understand that they're doing it, or in some cases, where they're trying to convince you to think like they do (as happened to me a few years back.)
no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 04:31 pm (UTC)The difference is, I don't go into someone else's journal and post "Angel is a cold-blooded, murdering asshole." on their Angel-love-fest....which would just be so rude (even if I think it).
I'd go post that thought in MY journal, where it belongs, if I felt the need. And erm....I have posted such in mine. And recived ugly replies, as well as well-thought out ones.
I'm not sure why people do that. It's like your opinions offend them to the Nth degree and they just *have* to comment on it. Then they go all bat-shit crazy sometimes if you disagree with what they tell you. Which is just so rude.
*g*
Oh and nice icon! Just seems to fit Connor, doesn't it? Always the outsider looking in and he wants so very much to belong but he's his own worst enemy and...
Kinda like Lindsey.
*winks*
no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 04:00 pm (UTC)But I do so love your poll. Heee!
However, you left off choices!!! What if I LIKE Connor, but for different reasons than you, and post about that in my journal linking back to yours? See, totally an option.
And asshattery in someone else's journal is just, well, shitty. >:{
*Is not an asshat*
no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 04:08 pm (UTC)And hahahaha, I KNOW you like Connor!! But I was making a point, you see. (And yes, I SO SHOULD HAVE put in an option of "Connor? Did someone say Connor? *drooool*" My faux pas. Heh.)
no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 04:20 pm (UTC)also, *drools over your icon, cuz DAYAM!*
no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 04:17 pm (UTC)But, seriously, dude. Do people, like, go out of their way to be asshats or something.
Although, to be fair, I never disliked any character on AtS, even when I wanted to strangle them or slap them silly. Oddly enough, I feel nothing but Beeg Wuv for Connor, the screwed up little puppy.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 04:21 pm (UTC)And yeah - there are times I'm upset with a character, but that's because I love the show (and the people in it) so much that I care what they're doing - that's good storytelling, imo. And man, it should be well documented by now how much I love me some Connor. Oh, break my heart, kiddo. *holds him*
no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 04:43 pm (UTC)*glowers*
no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 05:36 pm (UTC)People can just be thick sometimes, sheeeeesh.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 04:54 pm (UTC)My friend Deb got me to read a book called "Snow Flower and the Secret Fan." Very depressing. All about the life of women in China in the 1800s. Talk about making you glad you live where and when you do...
no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 05:38 pm (UTC)Ooooh. So. Is that an anti-rec? Or read it and know I'm going to feel dismal because it's well done?
no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 07:31 pm (UTC)The theme of the book is bonds between women, and showing how they were the same then as now -- love, support, and betrayal.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 05:47 pm (UTC)I forgot to tape "Big Love!" *runs to HBO.com to see when it airs again*
no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 05:59 pm (UTC)I think it comes on tonight or tomorrow?
no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 06:12 pm (UTC)OMG, Stoney. The other day one of my brother in law's friends came by to see him on the construction site and he was so incredibly hot, in a wholesome carpentery way and had unbuttoned his shirt enough to catch the breeze and his chest hair as he and Rob chatted and had cold water. His golden curly against lightly tanned golden skin chest hair. Man, it was hard not to just stare and stick my hand in his shirt. ::drools:: And lick him.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 06:37 pm (UTC)OoooooOOooooooOOooooh. I am in love with this construction worker carpentery hot ass with the lightly tanned golden skin YESSSS. I think you should have stuck your hand in his shirt and drooled. You could claim to be "tetched" and gotten a quick feel! HAHAHAHAHA! <3
Hidy.
Date: 2007-06-12 06:25 pm (UTC)*crosses fingers*
You cheer me up.
M
Re: Hidy.
Date: 2007-06-12 06:35 pm (UTC)How sweet of you to say!! And I'm CRACKING UP at Conndom, heeeeeee! I hope to have something(s) good to share soon, what a bolster to my mood! (Talk about cheering...) Thanks. :*
no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 06:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 06:32 pm (UTC)If Betty bought a bit of butter but the butter was too bitter but she put it in her batter, should she buy a bit of better butter to make her bitter batter better?
no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 06:39 pm (UTC)<3 (OH MY GOODNESS HAVE FUN THIS WEEKEND!!! <3 <3 <3)
no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 06:42 pm (UTC)But if it was something I really didn't agree with, it's possible I might (nicely!) give my differing opinion. Normally, though, I either A) am too lazy to bother, or B) know the OP will take it as some sort of attack and think I'm a big meanie-head, no matter what I say.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 08:11 pm (UTC)Every time I read "LDS," I think about Star Trek IV and Spock's unfortunate accident with it.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 08:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 08:19 pm (UTC)*tears up a little; sheds a perfect tear*
no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 08:22 pm (UTC)Also, EEEEE to your icon. Hahaha! I'm reading the script. [/cryptic]
no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 09:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 09:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 11:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 11:38 pm (UTC)...wait a minute!
:D
no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 11:40 pm (UTC)*scrolls on by*
no subject
Date: 2007-06-13 12:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-13 12:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-13 01:52 am (UTC)Margene wasn't Mormon until the middle of last season or at least not from an actively practicing background. I do think it is odd that Barb, Bill and their kids don't wear them. Unless perhaps it's statement about how they are not LDS any longer.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-13 02:36 am (UTC)The thing is, a lot of the modern polygamists are brought in from the official church. They get married in the temple (the First Wives) and go through the endowment process to get their "official" garments. The kids wouldn't wear them. You only get your "endowments" (garments) when you're going on a mission or getting married.
I really think they don't have them wear it (and if anything, Bill would insist that Margene wear sleeves on her blouses - that's like, the law) as a simple sign of respect to the LDS church. To them, they're not secret, they're sacred. If that's why they're not wearing them on the show, I can respect that. If it's an oversight, it's a HUUUUUUUUGE one. Nothing comes between an LDS or FLDS person and their garments. Nada.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-13 02:56 am (UTC)Thanks for the explanation of the garments and how they're normally distributed. I don't think anything that I've read explained the exact process of getting the garments.
And yeah, even I as an outsider wondered about Margene's tank tops. Perhaps that's more a sign of how everyone treats Margene as a child and how Bill seems to be delighted in the fact that she always does things a little off.
They did mention the garments in the first episode. Barb and Bill were at a party and Barb said to Bill that another woman had been obviously checking for Barb's garment lines. It makes it seem that for whatever reason they are not wearing them, it's deliberate.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-13 04:14 am (UTC)Oh, I must have missed that mention about Barb's garments! I've only seen the episode once, back when it aired, so I'm fuzzy on the show's details. Make this another show I need on DVD. :D
no subject
Date: 2007-06-13 05:20 am (UTC)All I have are ice cream sandwiches. So not in the same category.
Meanwhile, I agree with you on everything. Except for the parts that I don't. Which, if I were to comment at all about, would be totally for the purposes of opening a dialogue and possibly finding new light shed on a character I previously didn't know that much about.
Or, ya know, I'll just bitch about it in my corner and tell everyone how crazy everyone else is.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-13 11:48 am (UTC)Oh, but you know? I actually like ice cream sandwiches over popcicles! (Unless they're fudgicles - nothing's better than that.) Skinny Cow is my favorite - they're almost like Big Wheels, but without the fat. And they actually taste better! Mmmmmmm.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-15 09:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-15 01:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-16 07:41 am (UTC)