Did everyone suddenly become very stupid?
Dec. 27th, 2007 10:00 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Not you, of course. Everyone else.
So.... creationism is coming to Texas schools, possibly. Note: creationism is not science. It is religion. <-- I'm still shocked that this is debatable. It is RELIGION. Religion doesn't go in public schools. That was why we left England and made our own country. (Well, a part of it. Minuscule part, but still a part.) How do I know it's religion? Because it's about GOD. Also, it's only ONE religion's theory. I've discussed my thoughts on this before, so I won't expound, except to say that why can't these people consider evolution to be the "intelligent design?" OCCAM'S RAZOR, PEOPLE.
HOWEVER!
A letter to the editor today got me shaking with frustration.
Here's his letter:
OH MY GOD, THE STUPIDITY IN THIS LETTER. *head desk times a zillion*
Okay. After cracking my knuckles, I wrote back. (I have a pretty good track record of getting published, so I've got high hopes. I've got high apple pie in the sky hopes.)
[ETA} I just realized that I posted my first draft, which was full of errors. Including an extra "s" some awkward sentence structure, and forgetting that GRAVITY IS A LAW. *cough* Newton's Law, to be exact. I win the Awesome Sauce Award for ragging on someone's stupidity while being stupid myself. :D Now posting the ACTUAL letter I sent.... *g*
At the top of my list of Things You Shouldn't Talk About When You Don't Understand The Concept:
EVOLUTION.
Oh, hey. The small, raccoon sized rat-like creature that was recently discovered to be the ancestor to the WHALE would like to have a word. Uh, BOOYAH. (Isn't that awesome? YAY PRECAMBRIAN EXPLOSION FOSSIL RECORD!) I like how the first link (YAY) shows the SCIENTIFIC METHOD involved in supporting the Big Bang Theory. *loves science like whoa*
Finally, if anyone knows of excellent post series Freaks and Geeks fanfic, I'd like a link, kthx. (And I've been futzing with a fic idea for two days now.) *cries* Never again will I watch a series that has been canceled before resolution is achieved. That show hurt me, guys. <3
So.... creationism is coming to Texas schools, possibly. Note: creationism is not science. It is religion. <-- I'm still shocked that this is debatable. It is RELIGION. Religion doesn't go in public schools. That was why we left England and made our own country. (Well, a part of it. Minuscule part, but still a part.) How do I know it's religion? Because it's about GOD. Also, it's only ONE religion's theory. I've discussed my thoughts on this before, so I won't expound, except to say that why can't these people consider evolution to be the "intelligent design?" OCCAM'S RAZOR, PEOPLE.
HOWEVER!
A letter to the editor today got me shaking with frustration.
Here's his letter:
[Another writer that doesn't like creationism] believes intelligent design should be removed from science classes because it cannot be tested and supported or disproved by scientific standards. I could not agree more. This is theory and should be taught in a theory course, just like the theory of evolution, which has been disproved by the scientific method.
Thousands of species of animals, insects and plants live on this planet. They are totally distinct from one another. The idea that they evolved from the most primitive forms of life through random mutation, natural selection and survival of the fittest is disproved by fossil history. Fossil history suggests that some species have gone through some evolving, but a fish did not walk out of the water and become a bird, or a dinosaur, then a lion, then a kangaroo, then an ape, and finally a man. It simply didn't happen that way [note: I AGREE, freaking moron] And as ludicrous as it is, this theory is promoted as science.
~Butt-scratching mouth-breather
OH MY GOD, THE STUPIDITY IN THIS LETTER. *head desk times a zillion*
Okay. After cracking my knuckles, I wrote back. (I have a pretty good track record of getting published, so I've got high hopes. I've got high apple pie in the sky hopes.)
EVOLUTION SCHMEVOLUTION?
re: [Butt-scratching Mouth-Breather's Letter to the Editor, Thursday, Dec. 27th "Teach Theory as Theory"
I shouldn't still be shocked by the proud ignorance of our populace. And yet... It baffles me that people who profess "evolution can't be science because it's only a theory" don't understand that in science, a theory isn't the same as some Joes sitting around a table theorizing about chicks. Gravity was only a theory for centuries, and we're all pretty confident that things fall down, yes?
Mr. [Rama lama ding dong] pooh poohs the "science" of the fossil record, then continues to completely not understand the science behind evolution (even differentiating between the same thing: natural selection and survival of the fittest), not realizing that there are billions of species on the earth (not "thousands"), and then making the ludicrous claim that the fossil record doesn't support evolution.
Perhaps if he (and many others) actually listened in science class, they would know this. But hey - keep writing in,folks. It just shows that not only do we need to keep science classes, perhaps we should add more science classes to the roster. (And if Creationism is added, I'd like more than the southern Christian snake talking in a tree course. Let's throw in Ra, the turtle shell concept,and the Spider that threw a Web and created the Stars and Mother Earth.)
Nyah nyah nyah Nyah nyah,
Awesome McSmarty Pants <-- not my actual signature
[ETA} I just realized that I posted my first draft, which was full of errors. Including an extra "s" some awkward sentence structure, and forgetting that GRAVITY IS A LAW. *cough* Newton's Law, to be exact. I win the Awesome Sauce Award for ragging on someone's stupidity while being stupid myself. :D Now posting the ACTUAL letter I sent.... *g*
At the top of my list of Things You Shouldn't Talk About When You Don't Understand The Concept:
EVOLUTION.
Oh, hey. The small, raccoon sized rat-like creature that was recently discovered to be the ancestor to the WHALE would like to have a word. Uh, BOOYAH. (Isn't that awesome? YAY PRECAMBRIAN EXPLOSION FOSSIL RECORD!) I like how the first link (YAY) shows the SCIENTIFIC METHOD involved in supporting the Big Bang Theory. *loves science like whoa*
Finally, if anyone knows of excellent post series Freaks and Geeks fanfic, I'd like a link, kthx. (And I've been futzing with a fic idea for two days now.) *cries* Never again will I watch a series that has been canceled before resolution is achieved. That show hurt me, guys. <3
no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 04:09 pm (UTC)*headdesk to inifinty too*
Good luck with getting your reply published!
*hearts you*
no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 04:14 pm (UTC)<3 <3 <3
no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 04:10 pm (UTC)Alas, though we're descended from people who moved here for religious freedom, we're also descended from crazy-pants religious nuts who couldn't get along with other people. And, y'know, they bred.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 04:15 pm (UTC):D
no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 04:28 pm (UTC)YES YOU CAN, DICKSMACK! GAH!
no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 04:33 pm (UTC)Man, you can wish people a merry christmas! This purported "{War on Christmas" drives me crazy. You (not YOU you) just have to give EQUAL TIME to others, JEEEEEZ.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 04:28 pm (UTC)But...that...I mean...
*reads again*
No, I read it right the first time. The man's a git who doesn't understand most anything science related. I was a Spanish Lit-Theatre major in college (read: second most useless degree EVAR), for crying out loud, and even I know that doesn't work. *headdesk*
no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 04:34 pm (UTC)Isn't his letter shocking?! Like, it's breathtakingly stupid. Talk about missing the point ENTIRELY! (I firmly believe the editorial staff printed that in hopes of a flood of "WTF, no seriously, WTF?" letters. *G*)
(Hahahahah to your icon!!)
no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 04:51 pm (UTC)JEEZUM CROW. This is the most basic of taxonomies in science, how we order investigations, that "Theory" is just one step away from "Law". The only reason we still term it a Theory is that we're discovering more hypothesis that can be verifiably tested and grouped together under its aegis, so there needs to be a certain flexibility to it to continue to account for greater nuances supporting what we already know.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 05:04 pm (UTC)*also loves you for many, many other reasons as well*
We as humans only have TWO "laws!" The creationists simply don't understand how science really works. I've heard ID detractors explain (wonderfully) that ID/Creationism can't be considered "science" simply because it's a negative concept, it doesn't further thought, only stops it. <3
It's a science of No. Which... isn't science. Science is "what if" and supported by testing, data, etc. Evolution has undergone serious testing/etc. for 150 years and is still here. Um... getting more and more supportive data every day, in fact. :)
no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 05:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 05:13 pm (UTC)*plays Guitar Hero and eats fudge*
I'm... not helping, am I? *g*
no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 05:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 06:03 pm (UTC)*hugs you* Hope you had a good holiday!
no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 06:00 pm (UTC)Uh, if that's what they're teaching as evolution these days, then clearly somebody's doing something wrong.
And I clearly remember being taught that in science "theory" does not mean what you think it means. I guess Mr. Mouth-breather was away that day.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 06:04 pm (UTC)I think Mr. Mouth-Breather wasn't available for MOST of his science classes. Sheesh!
no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 06:11 pm (UTC)Oh, you're so hot when you talk all scientific and pwn people all over the place.
MOUTH-BREATHER NEEDS TO DIE IN A FIRE. Surely we can get a death sentence on charges of crimes against the species, the universe and everything.
Mmmh, tasty precambrian explosion links.
I just went looking for a site about fossils deposits in (somewhere I can't remember which is what let me to google), and the third (3rd!)result google returned for a "precambrian explosion" search was a site that tries to prove Noah's Flood is trufax. *flail* While I was reading I kept yelling words at the screen. (mostly: LAYERS! DEPOSITS IN LAYERS! MILLIONS OF YEARS!!!! ARGHHH!)
I´ll stop reading creationist sites now, or I'll get so annoyed I pop a blood vessel in the brain.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 06:19 pm (UTC)Who wasn't convinced that the world was ROUND.
I truly believe some people are too stupid to be free. We should lock them up.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 06:31 pm (UTC)Omg, I am ACHING like I've got a phantom limb.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 07:07 pm (UTC)Someone approached him about teaching creationism in his classroom, and he told them that the purple spaghetti monster was not going to be a part of his curriculum, and to kindly go the fuck away.
LOL.
Since AP Physics teachers are hard to come by, he has a degree in rocket science, is duel certified in math and applied sciences, and has an assload of experience teaching AP courses for someone his age, the school district pretty much kisses his ass.
Its great.
He really love shutting down the ignorant parents. Once, a parent was arguing with him about something, and tried to be like, "Well. What do you know. Your degree is in education." And, he was like, "Actually. I'm a rocket scientist. But, even if I weren't a rocket scientist, you'd still be wrong."
Bwah.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 07:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 07:14 pm (UTC)That's the way to reconcile faith and science, people.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 07:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 07:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 07:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 08:30 pm (UTC)I completely agree! Dont' label creationalism a science unless it's a social one.... and then include all the other creation stories from other cultures.....
no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 08:33 pm (UTC)I don't see why that is so HAAAAARD, gah!
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 09:09 pm (UTC)I especially like the "YAY" link. What a wonderful synopsis of so many important topics.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 09:33 pm (UTC)There was an excellent letter a few days ago from the entire science department of UT. There's as many "No Creationism!" letters as "No Evolution!" letters being printed, but they haven't reported how many of each side are coming in... I'd be curious to see that number.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 09:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 09:32 pm (UTC)Pennsylvania got rid of them, I'm hoping we can prove to be as intelligent overall.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 10:49 pm (UTC)Make your own Flying Spaghetti Gingerbread Monsters! (http://flickr.com/photos/fsmcookies/) Celebrate the holidays by eating the undisprovable creator of the universe!
no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 11:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 11:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-28 12:50 am (UTC)Thank you for sending in that letter. Please let us know if/when it's published.
One common and much perpetuated misunderstanding in the press coverage of this issue makes me crazy: the invariable failure of the interviewer, newscaster, article writer - whatever, or even the interviewee, to distinguish and emphasize the difference between the definition of "theory" as it's used and understood in science and its meaning in the common vernacular. It seems to me that this point should be first and foremost in any discussion about why evolution is science and intelligent design is not. Until that distinction is finally pounded into the heads of the public and generally understood, then even people without a particular religious agenda will continue to give the question of intelligent design being taught in public schools the misplaced dignity of serious consideration.
I watched and adored Freaks and Geeks when it was broadcast. One of the few network shows I liked and committed to so of course they yanked it off the air. Can't help you with fanfic for it though.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-28 01:06 am (UTC)*cries for you, Argentina... er, Texas*
no subject
Date: 2007-12-28 01:59 am (UTC)I kind of want Evolution to be wrong, because believing we're all related to this guy? Kind of sucks. In fact, I hope genetics in general is completely wrong and that there's no way in hell this guy's children will get his genes.
Here's a link for ya: http://objectiveministries.org/creation/sciencefair.html
It's a Creation "Science" Fair link I found a few months ago.
For the Elementary School Lever:
1st Place: "My Uncle Is A Man Named Steve (Not A Monkey)"
And my favorite... From the middle school level:
2nd Place: "Women Were Designed For Homemaking"
no subject
Date: 2007-12-28 02:22 am (UTC)"Using Prayer To Microevolve Latent Antibiotic Resistance In Bacteria"?!?!?!?!?! For my HS project I extracted anthocyanins from grapes and tested its effectiveness as an antimicrobial agent against common anti-acne antibiotics. In retrospect I should've just prayed to the Lord to kill all the bacteria in my experimental group. Maybe that would've worked better, as the anthocyanins didn't work at all.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-12-28 02:38 am (UTC)Oh, and the lady who said "'In the beginning, God created...' To me, that's all I need to know."? The documentary said that 1/3 to 1/2 of America believes the same. Well no wonder America is lagging in education measures compared to the rest of the developed world.
Srsly, the state of science education in America makes me cry. We immigrated here for this???? T_T
no subject
Date: 2007-12-28 02:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-28 02:40 am (UTC)Judgement Day: Intelligent Design On Trial (http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/id/program.html)
This is a web-based TV documentary concerning a court case in the US where science teachers and parents in Dover, Pennsylvania filed a lawsuit against the town's school board in federal court in order to stop them trying to force Intelligent Design being taught 'as Science' in the local school. It thoroughly covers the arguments for and against and basically exposes ID as simply Creationism in disguise. Highly recommended.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-29 05:48 am (UTC)I get so *pissed* at this shite. And yes, please, if you really, really think that you should put your not actually creationism!haha!'Intelligent Design' into schools then i want *all* the damn creation myths in there, too, because they all hold *exactly* the same amount of water.
*flails around like a loon*
Dear gods.