Have been told 1= Yes, 2 = Yes, Yes. If you know otherwise, feel free to chime in. :)
3. Would someone write my query letter to an agent for me for a plate of nachos? ;)
For those wondering what the hell I'm talking about, I think I've finally finished my book, Oh My Heck! An Insider's Guide To Identifying (and avoiding) Mormons.
(so people don't want electronic submissions typically, huh? Damn. It's so much faster.)
OT: happy birthday, Snow!
OT #2: I had a crap bottle of wine last night that tasted like apple juice with a dirty sock soaking in it. GROSS. Fortunately I had a bottle of bordeaux on hand to get the stink out. If you like overly sweet wine, or really fruity (to the point of being tropical) Reisling, that's your wine. you can have all of it.
OT #3: You can still play the music meme from yesterday! READ THE RULES. There's some fun music for downloading over there, too. Big thanks to those of you that shared your lists and the links to go with it.
Advice from someone who has worked as an editor
Date: 2009-01-14 04:19 pm (UTC)Table of Contents is also a must. Yes, before the prologue.
LOL. I think you can find sample query letters on Google. ;-)
no subject
Date: 2009-01-14 04:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-14 04:25 pm (UTC)Re: Advice from someone who has worked as an editor
Date: 2009-01-14 04:50 pm (UTC)I have sample querry letters in Writers Market, I'm just wanting to be laaaaaaaaazy. ;)
Thank you for the advice!
no subject
Date: 2009-01-14 04:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-14 04:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-14 04:58 pm (UTC)Julia, I can make excuses for a glass of red as health-enhancing, so when I drink, I drink that
Re: Advice from someone who has worked as an editor
Date: 2009-01-14 05:00 pm (UTC)Hehe. Just do it like a high school book report--snag one and edit it only as much as you need to be about your book and still make grammatical sense. ;-) (Not that I ever did that...)
No problem. :-)
no subject
Date: 2009-01-14 05:09 pm (UTC)3 - Search here for all your agently advice: http://misssnark.blogspot.com/
ETA: FOLLOW THE SUBMISSION REQs, NO MATTER HOW STRANGE.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-14 05:24 pm (UTC)I'm with you: red wine, and the more robust and spicy, the better!
no subject
Date: 2009-01-14 05:24 pm (UTC)Oh, isn't her site great? I had forgotten that I bookmarked that - thank you!
no subject
Date: 2009-01-14 05:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-14 05:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-14 05:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-14 05:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-14 05:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-14 05:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-14 05:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-14 05:34 pm (UTC)How many people are you sending it to? I am so interested in all of this, I can't wait to hear all the details. Like, every single nuts and bolt publishing geekfact, I am there. And REALLY EXCITED, as doubtless the editors will be too! How did you decide where to send it?
no subject
Date: 2009-01-14 05:38 pm (UTC)on every page?
no subject
Date: 2009-01-14 05:41 pm (UTC)I'm using "Writer's Market" as a guide on how to do, well, everything.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-14 05:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-14 06:39 pm (UTC)Now if I could only finish mine...
no subject
Date: 2009-01-14 06:58 pm (UTC)And good luck with your own: you can dooo eet!
no subject
Date: 2009-01-14 07:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-14 07:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-14 09:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-14 09:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-14 09:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-14 09:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-14 10:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-14 10:45 pm (UTC)Double space everything, you mean
paragraphs like this?
***
Or even with
sentences that
wrap?
I just have
single space like this. SO MANY RULES!!
no subject
Date: 2009-01-14 10:49 pm (UTC)Kids just leave. Need adult fodder. *cute face* Please? ;)
no subject
Date: 2009-01-14 10:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-14 11:28 pm (UTC)I repeat self to show what I mean hahahaha. (In italics).
Yup, just like that. You're using Word, I'm guessing? You should be able
to do the entire doc through the spacing toggle, just select all then
change to double spacing. So then it would look like this:
I repeat self to show what I mean hahahaha.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-14 11:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-15 01:54 am (UTC)Wine: "wine last night that tasted like apple juice with a dirty sock soaking in it"
Ironically, the one example I've ever heard of where someone made wine with apple (and grape) juice using a dirty sock as the yeast starter? Apparently turned out pretty well, given that it was 'matured' for 2 weeks in a tied-off garbage bag. It was an experiment in creating prison hooch.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-15 05:33 am (UTC)In Word you can automatically generate a Table of Contents very easily *if* you use styles for headers. For example, if you use the Style "Heading 1" for each chapter heading, "Heading 2" for subheadings within the chapter and so on then you can simply use the Insert menu to insert an automatically generated ToC, complete with page numbers that automatically adjust if your pagination changes! This can be really critical because it is massively annoying if you have to keep going back and adjusting page numbers as you edit the manuscript (or change from single to double spacing).
Now, if you're like me, you may look at the style that Word uses by default for "Heading 1" and say no way! But don't forget that you can edit styles to suit your particular look and feel and still retain the auto generation ability.
Ok.. well since, as I said, you mentioned earlier that you were using Works I'll leave it there. If it turns out that Works will do this too and you're interested then there are a few tricks I can also mention that let you make the ToC more customised.
Sock wine
Date: 2009-01-15 09:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-15 01:00 pm (UTC)I really appreciate all the thoughtful and supportive comments, thank you!
Re: Sock wine
Date: 2009-01-15 01:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-15 01:44 pm (UTC)If you're going to have access to Word then I'll pass on
My problem with the ToC creation facility using styles was that it only creates an entry in the ToC when there is a heading in the text (obviously). Unfortunately, this means that to get a really comprehensive ToC (which I wanted, since I wasn't using an index for that particular book) you need *heaps* of headings and that makes the text look very strange. You end up with chapters that look as if they have more headings than text!
The solution is that you use Header levels 1 and 2 for the legitimate headings that you want visible to the reader and then you change the style on the level 3 header so that the text is white on white. This makes them invisible to the reader (and when printed) but they still get picked up and incorporated into the ToC. When printed they just appear to be an empty line between paragraphs. Of course, in the ToC creation dialog box you have to tell it to go down to level 3 since the default is (I think) only levels 1 and 2 but that's easy to do.
Now this may not be needed for your book. Most of mine have been technical manuals or mathematics texts and that's a different style to yours. Perhaps yours only really needs the moderate ToC produced by using level 1 & 2 headers in the normal way? Ooh, plus, I should make sure I mention that I'm using the old Office 2003 not the most recent release. The most recent release changed a *lot* of things and may behave differently to what I've described.
Finally, take a tip from an old hand (waves zimmer frame). Assuming that your book is accepted by a publisher you're going to almost certainly be doing a lot of editing. One mistake I made at first was to keep editing just one file, making change after cumulative change. DON'T! Each day you work on it (or at least any time you make a significant change) make a new copy of it and work on the copy. Then the next day, copy the the new version etc (obviously you have to systematically date them). You end up with fifty or sixty versions but the advantages are a) if something goes wrong you lose only the latest version (Word is NOT stable!!) and b) if you change something and then discover that you liked the old version better then you still have the old one in an earlier file.