Get your Legislation off my body
Mar. 5th, 2005 09:17 amJust read that a bill is getting pushed through to bar hospitals from sending new mothers home with formula. Guess who's backing this? Breastfeeding advocate groups. Before you get your back up, let me say that every friend I have that breatsfed their children said it was beautiful, wonderful, a glorious bonding experience... Okay. And it's free. And studies show it's better for babies. yes, I know all of this, and I can agree with the statistics.
However.
I didn't breastfeed. I find it gross. Sorry. I'm not saying I find YOU gross, if you chose to do it, but there was a mental block with me to do so. Then there was the little problem with my body not wanting to cooperate (Because, see, I read all the books, knew all the stats, and was going to force myself to do something I didn't want for the sake of my baby, but my body said "No.")
Then there was the little issue of the hospital withholding food from my newborn son for 24 hours, to encourage him to want to suckle, and put me in more classes with a bunch of strange women with their tits hanging out (I'm private with my body), plastic cups on my nipples to make them produce milk, and finally, FINALLY, when one of the La Leche women told me they could EXTRACT THE MILK FROM MY BREASTS WITH A NEEDLE AND DEPOSIT IT IN THE BABY'S MOUTH I yelled at them to give me a friggin' bottle.
Because I had every intention of breastfeeding when I went in to deliver (I also planned on natural childbirth, but the nurse looked at me and laughed, saying, "honey, didn't you know natural means 'no make-up?'" Ha!!) I didn't have any formula at home. The hospital sent me home with starter bottles, and enough formula to get me through the next several days. Thank you.
My most special memory (aside from the actual birth) of my son was 2AM every night for the first month. He'd wake up, little fist curled and flailing above the bumper pads of the crib, I'd gather him up, take him into the quiet of the kitchen, turn the dimmer switch so there would be just enough light to see by, and heat up a bottle. That one minute of waiting was my favorite. He would look up at me with his little mouth in a perfect O, eyes wide and bright, and my hair would curtain his face from everything else. Is this less special, or unhealthy for him because he waited one minute? Because he wasn't attached to my body? I'll say this: that boy has been sick three times in 9 years. You read that correctly. He wasn't harmed by having formula.
I have problems with one group who feel their way is the ONLY way pushing legislation onto my body and my choices. Feeding a baby formula isn't going to HARM the baby. Breastmilk is better (due to the immunities a baby can get, etc.) but that doesn't inherently make formula BAD. I was raised on bottles, as were my sisters because it was thought in the middle part of last century that breastmilk was BAD. And we three turned out alright.
I think everyone read the rant yesterday about not having sex with men who don't care about you and your choices to have a baby, based on legislation about abortion, sex ed, etc. This follows along, in my opinion. I am so tired of my government holding my hand on EVERY issue, as they see fit. This isn't like helmet laws (which I'm on the fence with, also) or not allowing people to drink and drive. This is legislature about something very primal with a mother, and they need to step away and spend their money on something more important, like, say... making sure poor kids get a free breakfast at school. How about that? Or... making sure that some of the mothers that leave the hospital know how to RAISE A CHILD? GET A JOB? EDUCATION?? Feh.
I don't need no stinkin' legislation at my tits or twat, thank you very much.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-05 07:52 am (UTC)Good on yer.
*hugs*
no subject
Date: 2005-03-05 09:09 am (UTC)*hugs you back*
no subject
Date: 2005-03-05 09:16 am (UTC)LMAO! Only if you think leaking all over the place everytime the kid cries, having such sore nipples that you wanna cry every time they latch on, and never being able to get out of the 4am feed, fun. Still don't regret doing it, though. If for no other reason than it was free and if I hadn't, we probably wouldn't have eaten. :-D
no subject
Date: 2005-03-05 09:23 am (UTC)But I could give my husband the baby sometimes....
*hands you lifetime supply of udder cream for those sore nipples*
I went to church (gasp! I was religious waaaaay long ago) a week after #2, sans babies. Felt good, milk almost gone, then a baby next to me started crying, and I "let down" allllll over my pretty dress I had just started to fit back into. Nice mom of said baby lent me a baby blanket to drape over myself to walk out of church in the middle of service.
Motherhood is beautiful. Ha ha ha, tell me another one! ;-D
no subject
Date: 2005-03-05 09:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-05 08:02 am (UTC)I am so tired of my government holding my hand on EVERY issue, as they see fit. This isn't like helmet laws (which I'm on the fence with, also) or not allowing people to drink and drive. This is legislature about something very primal with a mother, and they need to step away and spend their money on something more important, like, say... making sure poor kids get a free breakfast at school. How about that?
ITA. This is not about the well-being of children-- this is about the government and lobbying groups wanting to dictate everything about women's choices, because god knows we can't make our own!
no subject
Date: 2005-03-05 09:10 am (UTC)Stay out of my body!! (Not you. You? Climb on it. Ha!)
This icon has never served me as well as it does today.
Date: 2005-03-05 09:00 am (UTC)I was relieved when they said I wasn't physically able and backed off to leave me to my formula-heating, because my boobies are a serious, tremendous erogenous zone, and I was too creeped out at the thought of it. I'm sure it's a powerful, magical, transcendent et al, but... No. I'm sure it's considered to be a more capital-I Important thing to breastfeed than to have blissful connubial relations as well. But I have a lack of talent when it comes to compartmentalizing such things. Let me see... this is difficult, but I'm going to go with the kid-baggage-lacking, squick-free orgasms, Bob. So, frankly, they can sit down and twirl on it.
Re: This icon has never served me as well as it does today.
Date: 2005-03-05 09:15 am (UTC)My...god. I... The icon WAITED for today. And I am so on board with you. My bewbies are for decoration and sex. And to make my sweaters look pretty. They are also pillows (dirty pillows, Carrie) for sleeping babies. But I was not into the idea of "clamping" and such.
No offense to those who did, which furthers my idea that it's a PERSONAL choice, and not some "you are KILLING your child if you don't do it our way!!"
no subject
Date: 2005-03-05 09:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-05 10:52 am (UTC)"I don't want my gov't in my business. Now in YOUR bedroom, YOUR marriage, YOUR brain, get 'em in there quick. Oh, and who the hell needs clean water, clean air, fair wage, a safe work environment... Oh, and I'm the politics of Jesus."
ha ha ha!! *sobs*
no subject
Date: 2005-03-05 10:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-05 10:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-05 10:33 am (UTC)And that bit about removing milk via needle? That's just too scary for words. Dayum.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-05 10:50 am (UTC)Let's just say that when they (in their calm, it will make everything alright...) started talking about nipple needles, I was beginning to see red. There was some yelling involved.
Sweet Jesus. NEEDLE in my BEWBIE.
*points to icon*
no subject
Date: 2005-03-05 11:33 am (UTC)Personally, I breastfed both exclusively. They never had formula. I know from other people's experiences that it just doesn't work sometimes. Formula is OK too. It has to be. Most of us were raised on it. It's not bad at all. Since I didn't work, the breastfeeding worked. I'm glad I did it.
But for someone to advocate not sending home formula is a crock. Do they want babies to starve? That's just not right. Not everyone can do it. They just need to lay off of mothers, whether it's dealing with formula or not letting mothers breastfeed their children in public.
Lastly, I have never heard of a hospital withholding any kind of food for twenty-four hours. What, are they crazy? Lawsuit happy? If this was approved by the La Leche League, that's nuts. I've never heard of them withholding food just because a baby had a hard time suckling. Someone there obviously doesn't know what they were doing.
So sorry that you had such a horrendous experience. It shouldn't have happened that way. But you know that your children are happy and healthy. That's all that matters.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-05 03:17 pm (UTC)The room with all the women plugging their kids on (and I was the only one it wasn't working for) was weird. I'm not comfortable with my boobs out in front of strangers, and they were all making a point of trying to help me, then it just kept on and on.... Like some weird competition.
It's interesting to note that there are NO LAWS governing anything concerning the male body's reproductive system, yet we have laws about birth, birth control, teaching girls about their bodies, and perhaps how females can FEED their babies from the get-go. Outrageous.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-05 04:40 pm (UTC)I was lucky the one time I had a problem, my childbirth educator came to my house and helped me fix it. No, no hanging out for strangers either. I always covered up all the way when feeding. I never wanted anyone to look at me or be distracting to the baby.
You know, it didn't work out for you. No biggie. I would just hate it if someone was trying to touch me when I was doing it and stuff. Too weird.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-05 11:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-05 03:19 pm (UTC)The main problem is the bullying by people who want their way to be the only way. I've always known that BF is better, but an alternative is formula. For each of my children I was always encouraged to try BF again, but was given formula so the babies could EAT.
Legislation needs to stay away from my body!!
no subject
Date: 2005-03-05 11:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-05 03:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-05 01:01 pm (UTC)I love the way you put that. That special little bubble with you and the baby in it, staring at each other with big big eyes. I guess if breastfeeding is the way you've experienced it then you might think it was THE BREAST part that did it.
Well....most of the physical things to do with reproduction are really really disconcerting. Varicose veins....menstruation.....labour.....stretch marks......sex.......some of it's worth reconciling to....
When my mother had my older sister, in the 50's, not a single woman in the ward with her was able to breastfeed because, 'colustrum, that's not really milk, who needs it?' was the official policy. I've just read what I've written and I can't believe the babies weren't fed for three days - wish I could remember what she said about it. But breastfeeding? I was satisfied with it. Legislation? Incredibly stupid and insensitive.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-05 03:23 pm (UTC)It's just such a primal/primitive response to feed your baby. I mentioned above that there are no laws governing male bodies in this manner. Instead of spending money on all of this, how about educating women on birth control? Free meals in school? Education? housing for the poor? I just feel that there are more important issues at hand right now than whether or not hospitals are allowed to offer formula for new mothers to take home. (Or, how about letting new mothers stay one night extra and get their strength back?)
Thanks for coming back over. Pop in any time! You always have something interesting to say!
no subject
Date: 2005-03-05 01:13 pm (UTC)Where I do think the government has the right and the duty to step in, is to keep the formula companies from misleading women both in this country and overseas into thinking that formula is better for their children than their own milk. As you may remember, this happened about three decades ago particularly with Nestle -- I remember when we were all encouraged to boycott Nestle for that reason. Nestle brainwashed women in Third World countries to the extent that their babies were suffering malnutrition, because of course they couldn't afford to buy the amount of formula that they needed, so they watered it down too much... but were not breastfeeding because they let themselves dry up. Formula companies are better than this today, but they still bombard expectant mothers with free samples, both at home while still only a few months pregnant (I believe with Nathan I received about 6 BOXES of formula) and in the hospital. The advertising is *just* this side of saying that formula is better than mother's milk. If they ever step over that line, I hope someone steps on them, HARD.
But yes, the government should not regulate whether babies can come home from the hospital with formula. That should be the parents' choice. I can't imagine this passing -- what if the mother simply for health reasons *cannot* breastfeed? Are they going to condemn the baby to starve?
no subject
Date: 2005-03-05 03:27 pm (UTC)And as a mother who used formula, I LOVED those free samples! Ha. My second was born in Utah, and ALL the women BF. So the nurses rounded up their formula (at the women's request - no robbery!!) and sent it home with me. I don't think I had to buy formula for a looong time. :-) But there you have a good example of how it can be: women are educated to which is healthier over all, told that formula is a fine alternative, and then let them choose.
I just want the government ofdf my reproductive parts!! As my husband just said, "well, someone should tell the government to write a law so my prostate exams are more gentle. And there should be a measured dispenser for lube." There's a reason why we're married: we're both nut jobs. :-)
no subject
Date: 2005-03-06 05:18 am (UTC)I think I donated them to the local food pantry? Can't remember, I had pregnancy brain at the time. :-)
no subject
Date: 2005-03-05 02:21 pm (UTC)I thought the whole thing about living in a free country was the ability to make choices like this FREELY. So, yeah, they need to back the fuck off. My tits are not their jurisdiction.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-05 03:29 pm (UTC)Just a few more years and he's gone...
no subject
Date: 2005-03-05 06:35 pm (UTC)Hmmm...maybe I'll write a hymn...
no subject
Date: 2005-03-05 03:43 pm (UTC)My baby cousin was only breastfed for a brief amount of time, her mother is a vegetarian and was unsure if she could provide enough nutrients. The baby is doing wonderfully well, progressing at a natural rate which is remarkable since she was quite premature. Though she does seemed to catch colds easily. *shrug* Who the fuck knows anyway? If we wait a week there'll be a new study. Again.
I think everyone read the rant yesterday about not having sex with men who don't care about you and your choices to have a baby, based on legislation about abortion, sex ed, etc.
Everyone except me, as usual. Point the way, please, sounds intriguing.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-05 05:45 pm (UTC)The main point was not about debating breastfeeding vs/ bottle feeding, but about someone telling me which I should do, or limiting someone to do contrary to what they wish I would do.
Which is a long way of saying keep your laws off my body. (Not YOUR laws. YOUR laws I welcome with a whimper and a quiver.)
no subject
Date: 2005-03-05 06:02 pm (UTC)I don't exactly see the correaltion between the article and the post. Is it just me? Am I missing something? I read both twice and I'm coming up blank. Help a sista out?
no subject
Date: 2005-03-05 06:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-05 06:11 pm (UTC)Thank you, ma'am, can I have another?
no subject
Date: 2005-03-05 06:11 pm (UTC)The whole "stop fucking them" bit wasn't the connection, bu the link from her post.
I confuse even myself. *drinks more wine*
no subject
Date: 2005-03-05 06:27 pm (UTC)"there aren't any laws saying I should have a more gentle prostate exam with a pre-determined amount of lube."
Though, wouldn't that be nice? It could work out for his benefit ;)
*grabs your wine glass, takes huge gulp*
no subject
Date: 2005-03-05 05:01 pm (UTC)PS. Where would that leave HIV mums? Last I heard the medical profession was at odds as to whether they should breastfeed?
And a needle...ewwwwwww!!!!
no subject
Date: 2005-03-05 05:42 pm (UTC)As to your choice to breastfeed (and as long as you did) as my husband just said over my shoulder, "while I don't agree with the length of time, because that is unfamiliar to me, I applaud her ability to make the choice to do something that was safe and healthful for her child." And I second that. When we were in Europe, it was not uncommon for me to walk into a restroom (in Hungary, in Austria) and find a mother with a toddler lying in her lap, nursing. That was incredibly foreign to me, but that doesn't make it inherently wrong, just unfamiliar. And as I am aware of the benefits to mother's milk, who's to say it isn't far better than some milk from the grocer that has been pumped full of chemicals and such?
It's the telling someone what to do with their body (and it doesn't involve a body hitting/punching/driving their car into/ another body.)
And the HIV mother is an EXCELLENT point to bring up. (What about mother's who can't produce milk? Who have inverted nipples? Who were molested and have body touching issues? They all exist.)
no subject
Date: 2005-03-08 07:20 am (UTC)