popping in for a meme and an "eh?"
Oct. 2nd, 2008 03:25 pmfrom
moosesal's lj:
In an upcoming interview with Katie Couric to be aired this week, Sarah Palin is unable to name any Supreme Court Case other than Roe v. Wade.
The Rules: Post info about ONE Supreme Court decision, modern or historic to your LJ. (Any decision, as long as it's not Roe v. Wade.) For those who see this on your f-list, take the meme to your OWN LJ to spread the fun.
The ONE CASE she should know as a Republican above all others:
Idiot woman, my god. Cannot WAIT for tonight's debate. Have my wine and my bingo card, and have high hopes!
In an upcoming interview with Katie Couric to be aired this week, Sarah Palin is unable to name any Supreme Court Case other than Roe v. Wade.
The Rules: Post info about ONE Supreme Court decision, modern or historic to your LJ. (Any decision, as long as it's not Roe v. Wade.) For those who see this on your f-list, take the meme to your OWN LJ to spread the fun.
The ONE CASE she should know as a Republican above all others:
Idiot woman, my god. Cannot WAIT for tonight's debate. Have my wine and my bingo card, and have high hopes!
no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 08:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 08:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 09:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 10:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 09:05 pm (UTC)Maybe she just wants to overturn that one -- bim bam boom, get rid of both those pesky "liberal activist" judges and the need to learn about the Supreme Court all in one fell swoop!
no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 09:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 09:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 09:59 pm (UTC)Is there a joke I'm missing?
no subject
Date: 2008-10-03 12:05 am (UTC)BvG did happen, and was (unfortunately for my candidate) well decided -- stupidity on the part of both the major parties gave rise to a problem that couldn't be resolved in the federally required timelines for the calling of the Electoral College without violating Equal Protection.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 10:27 pm (UTC)I would think that she'd be aware of Edwards v. Aguillard (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edwards_v._Aguillard) (1987), though. That occurred the year she graduated from college, and she was supposedly studying journalism. Not to mention Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District) (2005), even though that one only got to U.S. District Court.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 10:41 pm (UTC)And honestly, i'm not surprised she doesn't know a single case. She's an uneducated blow hard.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 11:02 pm (UTC)My faith in the system is somewhat nonexistent.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 11:03 pm (UTC)Plessy v. Ferguson is also a biggie. The constitutionality of racial segregation being upheld? The doctrine of Separate but equal?
I know she doesn't have a legal background, but my god, someone should have shoved an abridged version of the legal history of the US into her hands for shits and giggles. To be able to discuss american history intelligently is impressive to anyone.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 11:12 pm (UTC)(And ha, I love your vote of confidence in me. *G*)
no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 10:49 pm (UTC)What got me was that when Katie asked her what newspapers and magazines she read before becoming the VP nominee, she said "most of them" and when probed further, she went completely off topic about Alaska not being a foreign country. WTF?
My god, can she not name Time, Newsweek, The Washington Post? People magazine? Vogue? Guns and Ammo? Yahoo News?
no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 11:07 pm (UTC)Snark aside, I think that Palin fits Terry Pratchett's description of Sergeant Colon in The Fifth Elephant, p. 95:
"It wasn't that he was illiterate, but Fred Colon did need a bit of a think and a run-up to tackle anything much longer than a list and he tended to get lost in any word that had more than three syllables. He was, in fact, functionally literate. That is, he thought of reading and writing like he thought about boots--you needed them, but they weren't supposed to be fun, and you got suspicious about people who got a kick out of them."
no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 11:59 pm (UTC)The fact that you know what page that quote is on is fantastic. I am impressed.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-03 12:18 am (UTC)Preference?
no subject
Date: 2008-10-03 12:35 am (UTC)I'm a huge .pdf fan...
no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 11:12 pm (UTC)*tongue firmly in cheek*
no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 11:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 11:49 pm (UTC)I will say that even if they asked her in the manner you're suggesting, I'm still appalled at her lack of knowledge and ability to give a straight answer for other things.
BUT. Thank you for giving me a way to see both sides, I do appreciate that.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-03 12:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-03 12:19 am (UTC)